VOICE pushes for MAPS 4 benefiting all city residents
[Excerpts]
Earlier this year, Tena Jefferson received a late-night call from Oklahoma City police while she was out of town. Her house had been broken into, and the officer had the suspect in custody.
It was a family member who was dealing with mental illness problems and had recently been released from the hospital.
“The officer was very, very nice when I explained the situation,” Jefferson recalled. “But he said the only thing I could do is either charge him or (the officer) could turn him loose on the street. Those were my two options. Neither one acceptable.”
This story is not unique to members of VOICE, a local civic engagement organization made up of worker’s groups, various nonprofits, church congregations and others.
The group has been collecting input from residents about what they’d like to see in the upcoming MAPS 4 package and gathering opinions on the 16 project proposals that were presented to the city council for consideration, asking "What do you think that we need so much that you would be willing to tax yourself?" group member Terry Craghead said.
Organizers heard anecdotes of watching Oklahoma City residents having to maneuver wheelchairs down a busy road because there weren’t sidewalks, of family members living in shelters, of individuals with mental health or substance abuse problems not receiving services.
“The idea that these are the options we are giving people in our city over and over is really not acceptable,” said Nick Singer, who is part of VOICE and the First Unitarian Church. “If we can afford to do the many things we’ve done downtown, I think we can afford to build housing or provide a good transit system or places for people to go when they're in crisis.” . . .
Craghead said city residents are ready to apply the successes MAPS money created for business areas, entertainment districts and local schools to more complex social issues.
“I think people have seen the impact that MAPS has had downtown, and they’ve seen that capital investment and appreciate and enjoy those things,” Craghead said. “But they also see, in their daily lives, so many things that are still lacking.” . . .
But a few proposals consist of more entertainment-oriented projects, such as enhancements to the Chesapeake Arena, a new multipurpose stadium to be a home for a soccer team and improvements to the coliseum at State Fair Park.
Those projects have gotten pushback from the community, Singer said, pointing to various polls done to gauge project interest. And there are other ways to fund those specific projects, he added, saying that options like Tax Increment Financing districts, surcharges on event tickets, bonds or private donations could be raised more easily for those projects.
“The interesting thing to me is when you look at homelessness or public transit or walkability, people aren’t just for it, they are intensely for it,” Singer said. “When you look at the Chesapeake Arena, NBA improvements and the multipurpose stadium, not only is almost nobody for it, they are intensely against it.
“Why are the other things even on the table except there being a very narrow interest group that wants them? Based on public polling and all the surveys we’ve handed out, I don’t know where the constituency is of the taxpayers, the voting public, that supports those.”
